There were three initial responses that helped shape orthodoxy as it prepared for Chalcedon (A.D. ![]() 325), the central theological issue that presented itself to the Church was this: Now that Christ was understood to be fully God, of the same substance with the Father, how did his humanity relate to his deity. This is not an arbitrary pronouncement or belief, but is one that is central to an understanding of the Gospel.Īfter Nicea (A.D. Orthodoxy has historically claimed that Christ is fully God and fully man. I will try to navigate you to a point where you understand why I believe (tentatively) that Catholics deny Chalcedon because of their view of Mass. I am going to explain the issue and I want all of you to hang with me through some deep waters. So I write this post with the intention of informing my audience of a very intriguing issue, giving them a better look at Chalcedonian Christology, and giving an opportunity to Catholics to give an answer to this issue (if there are any that happen by-and there usually are). ![]() Having said that, it may be that I am misunderstanding things (this would not be a first). In other words, I believe that Catholics are at odds with some essential elements of orthodox Christology. ![]() At this point, I believe that it is very difficult for Roman Catholics who hold to Transubstantiation (is there any other kind of Roman Catholic!) to find harmony with a basic principle in the Definition of Chalcedon. I know that the title is provocative, but please understand that I am serious in this question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |